![]() The argument from evil concludes that the existence of the orthodox Christian God is, therefore, incompatible with the existence of evil and can be logically ruled out. ![]() The logical argument from evil asserts that a God with the attributes (1–3), must know about all evil, would be capable of preventing it, and as morally perfect would be motivated to do so. Most orthodox Christian theologians agree with these four propositions. God is omnibenevolent (morally perfect).Specifically, the argument from evil asserts that the following set of propositions are, by themselves, logically inconsistent or contradictory: ![]() Mackie, and to which the free-will defense responds, is an argument against the existence of the Christian God based on the idea that a logical contradiction exists between four theological tenets in orthodox Christian theology. ![]() The logical argument from evil argued by J. L. Mackie's formulation of the logical problem of evil argued that three attributes of God, omniscience, omnipotence, and omnibenevolence, in orthodox Christian theism are logically incompatible with the existence of evil. Plantinga's argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by the philosopher J. L. Alvin Plantinga's free-will defense is a logical argument developed by the American analytic philosopher Alvin Plantinga and published in its final version in his 1977 book God, Freedom, and Evil. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |